1.AS1100 Compliance Gap Analysis
Quality Engineering Dashboard · 2026
A quality engineering team utilized a dashboard to conduct a prioritized gap analysis of AS1100 compliance across a drawing library. The analysis identified 17 non-perfect findings across three parts, with PART03 carrying the highest burden. A Pareto chart revealed that three specific codes (TB01, TB04, and TB07) accounted for 52.9% of the errors, appearing in all three parts. This indicated process-level consistency gaps rather than isolated mistakes. By replacing manual pivot tables with this automated analysis, the team could quickly identify systemic drafting errors, such as a misapplied gd&t surface profile or surface profile tolerance, and prioritize remediation before certification audits.
What it shows:
Automating compliance analysis highlights systemic drafting errors for faster remediation.




